Rangers Chief Open to Ground-Sharing Talks with Celtic and City
A top Rangers executive has expressed openness to initiating discussions about a potential ground-sharing arrangement involving Celtic and the local city council, suggesting such talks would be “absolutely welcome” under the right circumstances.
With ongoing concerns surrounding infrastructure demands and the potential for collaboration on major events in Glasgow, the idea of ground-sharing—long considered taboo due to the fierce rivalry between Rangers and Celtic—has resurfaced. While traditionally unthinkable given the deep-rooted history and rivalry between the two clubs, modern logistical and financial realities could open the door to conversations about maximizing the use of existing stadium facilities.
The Rangers chief, while careful to stress that no formal plans are in place, signaled a readiness to engage in productive dialogue should city authorities or Celtic initiate contact. He emphasized the importance of being open-minded and collaborative when it comes to decisions that impact the wider sporting and civic community in Glasgow.
“If there was a legitimate conversation to be had, one that benefits all parties—Rangers, Celtic, and the city as a whole—we would absolutely welcome it,” he said. “We’re always willing to listen to ideas that support Scottish football and enhance Glasgow’s standing as a top sporting city.”
He further acknowledged that while rivalries and emotions run deep, there are occasions when pragmatism should prevail. “We have to separate football passion from practical solutions. If something makes sense for the clubs and the city, it deserves consideration.”
The discussion around shared facilities has previously emerged in contexts such as major tournaments, stadium refurbishments, and event hosting. Hampden Park, the national stadium, is often cited as an example of shared utility, and some believe the Old Firm clubs—despite their competitive history—could set an example by exploring cooperative ventures.
However, such a move would undoubtedly face resistance from sections of both fanbases, who pride themselves on the unique identity and independence of their respective clubs. Recognizing this, the Rangers official admitted any steps forward would require sensitivity, transparency, and broad consensus.
“There’s no suggestion that we’re replacing Ibrox or changing who we are,” he reassured supporters. “But if there’s a vision where collaboration can benefit everyone, it would be irresponsible not to consider it.”
While the concept remains theoretical for now, the chief’s comments signal a shift in tone and a willingness to embrace new ideas for the benefit of the wider football and civic landscape.