NFL pundits hate that the Packers traded Preston Smith for virtually nothing.

The Green Bay Packers’ decision to trade veteran linebacker Preston Smith has stirred controversy among NFL analysts, many of whom are criticizing the move as a misstep by the Packers’ front office. Traded for what is perceived as “virtually nothing,” Smith’s departure has left fans and pundits scratching their heads and wondering if Green Bay let go of a key defensive contributor without gaining sufficient compensation in return.

Smith, a nine-year NFL veteran, had become a mainstay in Green Bay’s defense since signing with the team in 2019. Known for his consistency, leadership, and knack for pressuring quarterbacks, he was considered a critical part of the Packers’ pass rush and defensive scheme. Last season, Smith recorded 8.5 sacks, continuing his role as a versatile linebacker who could drop back in coverage and effectively rush off the edge. His presence helped keep the Packers’ defensive unit competitive, even when the team’s offense experienced ups and downs.

This season, the Packers have struggled to stay consistent in an NFC North division that remains competitive, especially with the resurgence of the Detroit Lions and the reliable Minnesota Vikings. With the Packers looking at a season that could potentially end without a playoff berth, the need to rebuild or retool has been part of the discussion surrounding the team. However, trading Smith away, especially for minimal compensation, was a shock to many.

NFL experts argue that letting Smith go for such a low return was short-sighted and is likely to have significant implications for the team’s defensive performance. The Packers have historically struggled with retaining talent in their defensive lineup, often relying on younger, less-proven players to step into starting roles. Pundits have pointed out that trading away Smith, particularly for a future draft pick or a role player, doesn’t meet the value that a proven edge rusher brings to the team.

Fox Sports analyst Mark Schlereth weighed in, stating, “This trade feels like the Packers just gave away one of their best defenders for almost no benefit to the team this season. There’s no logical reason to part ways with Smith unless they were getting something meaningful in return.” Others agree, citing that Green Bay’s front office should have held out for a better offer or at least found a trade partner willing to meet Smith’s value as a veteran linebacker.

Packers fans have also expressed frustration, worried that the trade indicates a shift away from competitiveness and towards a rebuild. With quarterback Jordan Love still developing and showing moments of both promise and inexperience, many hoped that a strong defensive unit would balance the team and keep them competitive. Without Smith, fans fear the Packers’ pass rush could struggle, and their defense may face even more challenges, putting additional pressure on a young offense.

Additionally, Smith’s departure may also have consequences for locker room morale. A well-respected veteran, Smith was considered a leader and mentor to younger players on the defense, particularly for edge rushers trying to learn the ins and outs of the NFL. His absence leaves a gap not just on the field but in terms of guidance for Green Bay’s younger defensive talents.

For now, only time will tell how the Packers will manage without Smith and whether they can recover from a trade that many believe didn’t bring enough value back to the team. If Green Bay struggles defensively, particularly in their pass rush, fans and analysts alike may look back at this trade as a turning point in what has been a challenging season.