“San Donato Stadium Saga: Mayor Speaks Out Amid Growing Controversy”
AC Milan continues its efforts to relocate to San Donato, though concerns about the move persist, prompting a response from the Mayor of San Donato today.
From an outsider’s perspective, the ongoing stadium situation might appear as a back-and-forth, but in reality, the direction is clear: a departure from San Siro, despite the Mayor of Milan’s efforts to prevent it.
Describing it as a back-and-forth might be misleading, as each week the likelihood of a move seems to increase, even though there are ongoing attempts to sway both Milan and Inter from this decision.
Reports from last week indicated that both clubs were finally presented with WeBuild’s plans for San Siro, following criticism of the initial meeting for lcking substance. However, it appears these efforts may have little impact.
Today, Francesco Squeri spoke to *7Days* about the criticisms of the Rossoneri’s projects, with his comments relayed by *Calciomercato.com*.
“The stadium issue is very complex and multifaceted. It requires significant attention, as its development will shape the future of San Donato. Therefore, any evaluation necessitates thorough study and analysis. However, this focus does not detract from the regular administration of the municipality, which must continue despite this private initiative project.”
Regarding the stadium project, he noted, “We receive numerous requests from both the majority and the opposition. We welcome anything that addresses the critical aspects of the project and any constructive suggestions. Unfortunately, we don’t always see a proactive approach from those in opposition, despite their institutional roles. We simply acknowledge this.”
On the subject of criticism, he added, “I always listen to the concerns and fears expressed about the potential stadium development in San Donato. They often align with my own, which is why I am committed to ensuring that the Programme Agreement process addresses all the critical issues we’ve publicly highlighted.
“At times, I observe that legitimate dissent and criticism can go too far, but those in governance have a duty to respond substantively.”